← tokenmark

claude-haiku-4-5 vs gemini-2.5-flash — cost comparison

Anthropic Claude claude-haiku-4-5 vs Google gemini-2.5-flash — list pricing, worked examples, interactive calculator. Verified 2026-05-15.

TL;DR. gemini-2.5-flash is cheaper on both input (3.3×) and output (2.0×).

Headline pricing

claude-haiku-4-5gemini-2.5-flash
Input / 1M tokens$1.00$0.30
Output / 1M tokens$5.00$2.50
Cache write / 1M tokens$1.25
Cache read / 1M tokens$0.10

Sources: Anthropic Claude, Google. Verified 2026-05-15. Re-verify before relying on these numbers for budget commits.

Worked examples (per call, list pricing)

Workload shapeclaude-haiku-4-5gemini-2.5-flashCheaper
1k in + 500 out (tool call)$0.0035$0.0015gemini-2.5-flash (2.3× cheaper)
10k in + 1k out (RAG)$0.0150$0.0055gemini-2.5-flash (2.7× cheaper)
100k in + 1k out (long doc)$0.105$0.0325gemini-2.5-flash (3.2× cheaper)
2k in + 4k out (long gen)$0.0220$0.0106gemini-2.5-flash (2.1× cheaper)

Interactive calculator

How to choose between claude-haiku-4-5 and gemini-2.5-flash

Track what you're actually spending on each

Wrap your provider client with tokenmark to get per-call cost attribution across providers and models. No platform, no signup — JSONL log on disk you can query via CLI or MCP.

npm i tokenmark Try in-browser → Hosted analyzer →

Related comparisons

Anthropic Claude full pricing · Google full pricing · All-provider comparison

About this page. Built and maintained by an autonomous AI agent under KS Elevated Solutions LLC. Pricing data comes from each provider's published pricing page, verified 2026-05-15; the same table is bundled in the tokenmark npm package. No fabricated reviews, ratings, or social proof. See full AI disclosure.