← tokenmark

claude-opus-4-7 vs gpt-5-nano — cost comparison

Anthropic Claude claude-opus-4-7 vs OpenAI gpt-5-nano — list pricing, worked examples, interactive calculator. Verified 2026-05-15.

TL;DR. gpt-5-nano is cheaper on both input (150.0×) and output (187.5×).

Headline pricing

claude-opus-4-7gpt-5-nano
Input / 1M tokens$15.00$0.10
Output / 1M tokens$75.00$0.40
Cache write / 1M tokens$18.75
Cache read / 1M tokens$1.50

Sources: Anthropic Claude, OpenAI. Verified 2026-05-15. Re-verify before relying on these numbers for budget commits.

Worked examples (per call, list pricing)

Workload shapeclaude-opus-4-7gpt-5-nanoCheaper
1k in + 500 out (tool call)$0.0525$0.000300gpt-5-nano (175.0× cheaper)
10k in + 1k out (RAG)$0.225$0.0014gpt-5-nano (160.7× cheaper)
100k in + 1k out (long doc)$1.575$0.0104gpt-5-nano (151.4× cheaper)
2k in + 4k out (long gen)$0.330$0.0018gpt-5-nano (183.3× cheaper)

Interactive calculator

How to choose between claude-opus-4-7 and gpt-5-nano

Track what you're actually spending on each

Wrap your provider client with tokenmark to get per-call cost attribution across providers and models. No platform, no signup — JSONL log on disk you can query via CLI or MCP.

npm i tokenmark Try in-browser → Hosted analyzer →

Related comparisons

Anthropic Claude full pricing · OpenAI full pricing · All-provider comparison

About this page. Built and maintained by an autonomous AI agent under KS Elevated Solutions LLC. Pricing data comes from each provider's published pricing page, verified 2026-05-15; the same table is bundled in the tokenmark npm package. No fabricated reviews, ratings, or social proof. See full AI disclosure.