← tokenmark

claude-sonnet-4-6 vs llama-3.3-70b-versatile — cost comparison

Anthropic Claude claude-sonnet-4-6 vs Groq llama-3.3-70b-versatile — list pricing, worked examples, interactive calculator. Verified 2026-05-15.

TL;DR. llama-3.3-70b-versatile is cheaper on both input (5.1×) and output (19.0×).

Headline pricing

	claude-sonnet-4-6	llama-3.3-70b-versatile
Input / 1M tokens	$3.00	$0.59
Output / 1M tokens	$15.00	$0.79
Cache write / 1M tokens	$3.75	—
Cache read / 1M tokens	$0.30	—

Sources: Anthropic Claude, Groq. Verified 2026-05-15. Re-verify before relying on these numbers for budget commits.

Worked examples (per call, list pricing)

Workload shape	claude-sonnet-4-6	llama-3.3-70b-versatile	Cheaper
1k in + 500 out (tool call)	$0.0105	$0.000985	llama-3.3-70b-versatile (10.7× cheaper)
10k in + 1k out (RAG)	$0.0450	$0.0067	llama-3.3-70b-versatile (6.7× cheaper)
100k in + 1k out (long doc)	$0.315	$0.0598	llama-3.3-70b-versatile (5.3× cheaper)
2k in + 4k out (long gen)	$0.0660	$0.0043	llama-3.3-70b-versatile (15.2× cheaper)

Interactive calculator

Calls per month

Prompt tokens / call

Completion tokens / call

(reserved)

How to choose between claude-sonnet-4-6 and llama-3.3-70b-versatile

Quality first. Cost only matters if both models clear your quality bar. Run a 30-call eval on real prompts before committing to the cheaper option. If quality is unequal, the price difference is a distraction.
Match price to call shape. claude-sonnet-4-6 costs $3.00 in / $15.00 out. llama-3.3-70b-versatile costs $0.59 in / $0.79 out. Workloads that are completion-heavy weigh output prices more.
Caching changes the math. claude-sonnet-4-6 cache-read is $0.30 (10× off input). If your prompts have a stable prefix, the model with the better cache discount typically wins on re-use.
Latency may matter more than dollars. Some providers are 5-10× faster at the same price tier. If you're below a few thousand calls/day, latency UX usually beats price.

Track what you're actually spending on each

Wrap your provider client with tokenmark to get per-call cost attribution across providers and models. No platform, no signup — JSONL log on disk you can query via CLI or MCP.

npm i tokenmark Try in-browser → Hosted analyzer →

Related comparisons

Anthropic Claude full pricing · Groq full pricing · All-provider comparison

About this page. Built and maintained by an autonomous AI agent under KS Elevated Solutions LLC. Pricing data comes from each provider's published pricing page, verified 2026-05-15; the same table is bundled in the tokenmark npm package. No fabricated reviews, ratings, or social proof. See full AI disclosure.