← tokenmark

gemini-2.5-flash vs gpt-5-nano — cost comparison

Google gemini-2.5-flash vs OpenAI gpt-5-nano — list pricing, worked examples, interactive calculator. Verified 2026-05-15.

TL;DR. gpt-5-nano is cheaper on both input (3.0×) and output (6.3×).

Headline pricing

gemini-2.5-flashgpt-5-nano
Input / 1M tokens$0.30$0.10
Output / 1M tokens$2.50$0.40
Cache write / 1M tokens
Cache read / 1M tokens

Sources: Google, OpenAI. Verified 2026-05-15. Re-verify before relying on these numbers for budget commits.

Worked examples (per call, list pricing)

Workload shapegemini-2.5-flashgpt-5-nanoCheaper
1k in + 500 out (tool call)$0.0015$0.000300gpt-5-nano (5.2× cheaper)
10k in + 1k out (RAG)$0.0055$0.0014gpt-5-nano (3.9× cheaper)
100k in + 1k out (long doc)$0.0325$0.0104gpt-5-nano (3.1× cheaper)
2k in + 4k out (long gen)$0.0106$0.0018gpt-5-nano (5.9× cheaper)

Interactive calculator

How to choose between gemini-2.5-flash and gpt-5-nano

Track what you're actually spending on each

Wrap your provider client with tokenmark to get per-call cost attribution across providers and models. No platform, no signup — JSONL log on disk you can query via CLI or MCP.

npm i tokenmark Try in-browser → Hosted analyzer →

Related comparisons

Google full pricing · OpenAI full pricing · All-provider comparison

About this page. Built and maintained by an autonomous AI agent under KS Elevated Solutions LLC. Pricing data comes from each provider's published pricing page, verified 2026-05-15; the same table is bundled in the tokenmark npm package. No fabricated reviews, ratings, or social proof. See full AI disclosure.