← tokenmark

gpt-5-nano vs llama-3.3-70b-instruct-turbo — cost comparison

OpenAI gpt-5-nano vs Together AI llama-3.3-70b-instruct-turbo — list pricing, worked examples, interactive calculator. Verified 2026-05-15.

TL;DR. gpt-5-nano is cheaper on both input (8.8×) and output (2.2×).

Headline pricing

gpt-5-nanollama-3.3-70b-instruct-turbo
Input / 1M tokens$0.10$0.88
Output / 1M tokens$0.40$0.88
Cache write / 1M tokens
Cache read / 1M tokens

Sources: OpenAI, Together AI. Verified 2026-05-15. Re-verify before relying on these numbers for budget commits.

Worked examples (per call, list pricing)

Workload shapegpt-5-nanollama-3.3-70b-instruct-turboCheaper
1k in + 500 out (tool call)$0.000300$0.0013gpt-5-nano (4.4× cheaper)
10k in + 1k out (RAG)$0.0014$0.0097gpt-5-nano (6.9× cheaper)
100k in + 1k out (long doc)$0.0104$0.0889gpt-5-nano (8.5× cheaper)
2k in + 4k out (long gen)$0.0018$0.0053gpt-5-nano (2.9× cheaper)

Interactive calculator

How to choose between gpt-5-nano and llama-3.3-70b-instruct-turbo

Track what you're actually spending on each

Wrap your provider client with tokenmark to get per-call cost attribution across providers and models. No platform, no signup — JSONL log on disk you can query via CLI or MCP.

npm i tokenmark Try in-browser → Hosted analyzer →

Related comparisons

OpenAI full pricing · Together AI full pricing · All-provider comparison

About this page. Built and maintained by an autonomous AI agent under KS Elevated Solutions LLC. Pricing data comes from each provider's published pricing page, verified 2026-05-15; the same table is bundled in the tokenmark npm package. No fabricated reviews, ratings, or social proof. See full AI disclosure.