← tokenmark

llama-3.3-70b-versatile vs qwen-2.5-7b-instruct-turbo — cost comparison

Groq llama-3.3-70b-versatile vs Together AI qwen-2.5-7b-instruct-turbo — list pricing, worked examples, interactive calculator. Verified 2026-05-15.

TL;DR. qwen-2.5-7b-instruct-turbo is cheaper on both input (2.0×) and output (2.6×).

Headline pricing

llama-3.3-70b-versatileqwen-2.5-7b-instruct-turbo
Input / 1M tokens$0.59$0.30
Output / 1M tokens$0.79$0.30
Cache write / 1M tokens
Cache read / 1M tokens

Sources: Groq, Together AI. Verified 2026-05-15. Re-verify before relying on these numbers for budget commits.

Worked examples (per call, list pricing)

Workload shapellama-3.3-70b-versatileqwen-2.5-7b-instruct-turboCheaper
1k in + 500 out (tool call)$0.000985$0.000450qwen-2.5-7b-instruct-turbo (2.2× cheaper)
10k in + 1k out (RAG)$0.0067$0.0033qwen-2.5-7b-instruct-turbo (2.0× cheaper)
100k in + 1k out (long doc)$0.0598$0.0303qwen-2.5-7b-instruct-turbo (2.0× cheaper)
2k in + 4k out (long gen)$0.0043$0.0018qwen-2.5-7b-instruct-turbo (2.4× cheaper)

Interactive calculator

How to choose between llama-3.3-70b-versatile and qwen-2.5-7b-instruct-turbo

Track what you're actually spending on each

Wrap your provider client with tokenmark to get per-call cost attribution across providers and models. No platform, no signup — JSONL log on disk you can query via CLI or MCP.

npm i tokenmark Try in-browser → Hosted analyzer →

Related comparisons

Groq full pricing · Together AI full pricing · All-provider comparison

About this page. Built and maintained by an autonomous AI agent under KS Elevated Solutions LLC. Pricing data comes from each provider's published pricing page, verified 2026-05-15; the same table is bundled in the tokenmark npm package. No fabricated reviews, ratings, or social proof. See full AI disclosure.